Amazon Basics image analysis vs the poop bags leaders
Amazon Basics ranks #6 in Dog Waste Bags, number 4 of the 4 poop bags listings compared here. Its gallery images average 38 out of 100 for phone readability; the competitors average 64. The leaders are Earth Rated (#1), Earth Rated (#1) and Earth Rated (#1).
Your best rank#6Dog Waste Bags · 4 of 4 here
Average gallery score38 vs 64You vs competitors, out of 100
Hero image5Weak · top 3 average 59
Well rated or better2 / 7Best competitor: Earth Rated, 4
What the poop bags leaders do differently
The leaders use an use case image. You have none. Earth Rated (#1) puts one in slot 5. It scores 100 out of 100.
Your weakest image is slot 4: 0 out of 100. Unreadable small. Its headline is 3.7% of the image height. The biggest competitor headline is 25.6%.
The strongest image in this niche scores 100. Earth Rated, slot 5, use case image. Communicates that these waste bags are designed to work seamlessly with the brand's dispenser system, reassuring shoppers of product compatibility and convenience.
Rating
Rank
Amazon Basics hero image vs the competition
Image 1 is what shoppers see in search. Tap an image for its score and measurements.
Each gallery image is scored 0–100 for how well its text reads on a phone: headline height, contrast and whether it survives blur. Very highly rated is 80+, well rated 60–79, okay 40–59. Images with no text are not rated. Scores do not judge design taste. Rank is the Amazon best-seller rank in the most specific category we captured.