Maybelline ranks #2 in Mascara, number 2 of the 6 mascara listings compared here. Its gallery images average 61 out of 100 for phone readability; the competitors average 42. The leaders are essence (#1), L'Oreal Paris (#3) and Thrive Causemetics (#15).
Your best rank#2Mascara · 2 of 6 here
Average gallery score61 vs 42You vs competitors, out of 100
Hero image36Weak · top 3 average 26
Well rated or better4 / 7Best competitor: L'Oreal Paris, 6
What the mascara leaders do differently
The leaders use a single benefit image. You have none. L'Oreal Paris (#3) puts one in slot 5. It scores 88 out of 100.
Your weakest image is slot 1: 36 out of 100. Unreadable small. Its headline is 23.1% of the image height. The biggest competitor headline is 42.0%.
The strongest image in this niche scores 88. L'Oreal Paris, slot 5, single benefit image. Demonstrates the mascara's ability to deliver defined, separated lashes without clumping, reassuring shoppers of a clean, professional finish.
Rating
Rank
Maybelline hero image vs the competition
Image 1 is what shoppers see in search. Tap an image for its score and measurements.
No A+ captured yet for essence, L'Oreal Paris, Thrive Causemetics, ILIA and Nogcaw.
How these scores work
Each gallery image is scored 0–100 for how well its text reads on a phone: headline height, contrast and whether it survives blur. Very highly rated is 80+, well rated 60–79, okay 40–59. Images with no text are not rated. Scores do not judge design taste. Rank is the Amazon best-seller rank in the most specific category we captured.