M-Audio image analysis vs the computer recording audio interfaces leaders
M-Audio ranks #2 in Computer Recording Audio Interfaces, number 3 of the 8 computer recording audio interfaces listings compared here. Its gallery images average 47 out of 100 for phone readability; the competitors average 29. The leaders are Focusrite (#1), Focusrite (#1) and MOTU (#9).
Your best rank#2Computer Recording Audio Interfaces · 3 of 8 here
Average gallery score47 vs 29You vs competitors, out of 100
Hero image78Well rated · top 3 average 26
Well rated or better1 / 7Best competitor: Universal Audio, 3
What the computer recording audio interfaces leaders do differently
The leaders use a lifestyle image. You have none. Universal Audio (#57) puts one in slot 5. It scores 70 out of 100.
Your weakest image is slot 7: 25 out of 100. Unreadable small. Its headline is 3.0% of the image height. The biggest competitor headline is 65.2%.
The strongest image in this niche scores 75. CIXUN, slot 4, single benefit image. Communicates the product's HI-Z to loopback input capability, emphasizing its suitability for players, singers, and streamers who need high-quality audio routing.
Rating
Rank
M-Audio hero image vs the competition
Image 1 is what shoppers see in search. Tap an image for its score and measurements.
Each gallery image is scored 0–100 for how well its text reads on a phone: headline height, contrast and whether it survives blur. Very highly rated is 80+, well rated 60–79, okay 40–59. Images with no text are not rated. Scores do not judge design taste. Rank is the Amazon best-seller rank in the most specific category we captured.