Hartz ranks #4 in Cat Treats, number 5 of the 9 cat treat listings compared here. Its gallery images average 56 out of 100 for phone readability; the competitors average 49. The leaders are Temptations (#1), INABA (#1) and INABA (#1).
Your best rank#4Cat Treats · 5 of 9 here
Average gallery score56 vs 49You vs competitors, out of 100
Hero image42Okay · top 3 average 43
Well rated or better6 / 8Best competitor: Temptations, 6
What the cat treat leaders do differently
The leaders use a how to use image. You have none. INABA (#11) puts one in slot 4. It scores 80 out of 100.
Your weakest image is slot 8: 4 out of 100. Unreadable small. Its headline is 8.0% of the image height. The biggest competitor headline is 42.6%.
The strongest image in this niche scores 100. Temptations, slot 5, single benefit image. Communicates the product's appealing dual texture—crunchy exterior and creamy interior—to entice shoppers with a clear sensory benefit.
Rating
Rank
Hartz hero image vs the competition
Image 1 is what shoppers see in search. Tap an image for its score and measurements.
Each gallery image is scored 0–100 for how well its text reads on a phone: headline height, contrast and whether it survives blur. Very highly rated is 80+, well rated 60–79, okay 40–59. Images with no text are not rated. Scores do not judge design taste. Rank is the Amazon best-seller rank in the most specific category we captured.