Always image analysis vs the menstrual pads leaders
Always ranks #2 in Sanitary Napkins, number 2 of the 9 menstrual pads listings compared here. Its gallery images average 73 out of 100 for phone readability; the competitors average 50. The leaders are Rael (#1), Amazon Basics (#4) and Amazon Basics (#4). 1 competing listing has A+ content; we have not captured A+ for Always yet.
Your best rank#2Sanitary Napkins · 2 of 9 here
Average gallery score73 vs 50You vs competitors, out of 100
Hero image97Very highly rated · top 3 average 30
Well rated or better9 / 11Best competitor: Amazon Basics, 4
What the menstrual pads leaders do differently
The leaders use an ugc image. You have none. Natissy (#742) puts one in slot 6. It scores 75 out of 100.
Your weakest image is slot 10: 13 out of 100. Unreadable small. Its headline is 3.6% of the image height. The biggest competitor headline is 27.3%.
The strongest image in this niche scores 88. Amazon Basics, slot 5, product detail image. Highlights the product's contoured, profiled shape to communicate that it provides a comfortable, ergonomic fit for the user.
Rating
Rank
Always hero image vs the competition
Image 1 is what shoppers see in search. Tap an image for its score and measurements.
Each gallery image is scored 0–100 for how well its text reads on a phone: headline height, contrast and whether it survives blur. Very highly rated is 80+, well rated 60–79, okay 40–59. Images with no text are not rated. Scores do not judge design taste. Rank is the Amazon best-seller rank in the most specific category we captured.